- Inicio
- About
-
Políticas de la revista
Política de acceso abierto y costos Política de revisión por pares Política editorial Política antiplagio y conflicto de interés Política de ética editorial Política de autoarchivo y depósito de repositorios RETEE-DORA commitment Erratum and retraction policy Policy on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)
- Current
- Submissions
- Indexaciones
- Archives
Formularios de evaluación
Review elements according to the type of manuscript or contribution
Research Articles
Evaluates original manuscripts that present empirical or theoretical results, strictly following RETEE editorial standards.
Elements evaluated and criteria:
Title: Must be clear, specific, bilingual (Spanish and English), less than 15 words and comply with the requested format.
Abstract and Keywords: Must contain between 150 and 250 words in both languages, synthesising objectives, scope, findings and conclusions; keywords aligned with the UNESCO thesaurus.
Introduction: It presents context, justification, thematic delimitation and objective of the contribution, with recent references (at least 50%).
Development of the content (according to the type of contribution): For articles: materials, methods and clear results. For interventions: context, design and evaluation methodology. For reviews: selection criteria, thematic analysis and critical review.
Discussion: Interpret findings critically, compare with relevant literature, point out limitations and theoretical and practical implications.
Conclusions: Synthesises the findings without repeating them verbatim, highlighting contributions and suggestions for future research.
References: Minimum 30 updated references, preferably from the last 5 years, correctly applied in APA 7 format.
Style, writing and editorial standards: Use of clear academic writing, without spelling mistakes, strictly complying with RETEE format.
General comments: Space for the reviewer to note additional comments on relevant aspects not included in the previous criteria.
Overall evaluation of the manuscript (Accept / Revise / Reject): The reviewer selects the final recommendation: accept without changes, accept with minor changes, require major revision or reject.
Intervention Projects
Assesses applied studies that describe, implement and evaluate interventions in educational and social settings.
Elements assessed and criteria:
Title: Must be clear, specific, bilingual (Spanish and English), less than 15 words and comply with the requested format.
Abstract and Keywords: Must contain between 150 and 250 words in both languages, synthesising objectives, scope, findings and conclusions; keywords aligned to the UNESCO thesaurus.
Introduction: It presents context, justification, thematic delimitation and objective of the contribution, with recent references (at least 50%).
Development of the content (according to the type of contribution): For articles: materials, methods and clear results. For interventions: context, design and evaluation methodology. For reviews: selection criteria, thematic analysis and critical review.
Discussion: Interpret findings critically, compare with relevant literature, point out limitations and theoretical and practical implications.
Conclusions: Synthesises the findings without repeating them verbatim, highlighting contributions and suggestions for future research.
References: Minimum 25 updated references, preferably from the last 5 years, correctly applied in APA 7 format.
Style, writing and editorial standards: Use of clear academic writing, without spelling mistakes, strictly complying with RETEE format.
General comments: Space for the reviewer to note additional comments on relevant aspects not included in the previous criteria.
Overall evaluation of the manuscript (Accept / Revise / Reject): The reviewer selects the final recommendation: accept without changes, accept with minor changes, require major revision or reject.
Critical Reviews
Examines literature reviews that synthesise findings, identify gaps and emerging trends.
Elements assessed and criteria:
Title: Must be clear, specific, bilingual (Spanish and English), less than 15 words and comply with the requested format.
Abstract and Keywords: Must contain between 150 and 250 words in both languages, synthesising objectives, scope, findings and conclusions; keywords aligned to the UNESCO thesaurus.
Introduction: It presents context, justification, thematic delimitation and objective of the contribution, with recent references (at least 50%).
Development of the content (according to the type of contribution): For articles: materials, methods and clear results. For interventions: context, design and evaluation methodology. For reviews: selection criteria, thematic analysis and critical review.
Discussion: Interpret findings critically, compare with relevant literature, point out limitations and theoretical and practical implications.
Conclusions: Synthesises the findings without repeating them verbatim, highlighting contributions and suggestions for future research.
References: Minimum 40 updated references, preferably from the last 5 years, correctly applied in APA 7 format.
Style, writing and editorial standards: Use of clear academic writing, without spelling mistakes, strictly complying with RETEE format.
General comments: Space for the reviewer to note additional comments on relevant aspects not included in the previous criteria.
Overall evaluation of the manuscript (Accept / Revise / Reject): The reviewer selects the final recommendation: accept without changes, accept with minor changes, require major revision or reject.