Revolución, estructura y representación del mundo

Abstract

Text and world do not constitute a dichotomy given, not a relationship a priori, they are as practical epistemic, as cognitive act. Their deployment is performed through a terminology and under the auspices of a rhetoric, of a narrative which cannot be but historical, i.e. product of a process and the various moments that comprise it, that is, in its synchronic dimension that becomes so paradigmatic, canonical. Our object of study is the scriptural activity, i.e. recognition of a practice which aims to reproduce the world through the creation of a symbolic economy. Said in other words, this article it fits in a conception sociohistorical that defines the world as a constellation of representations articulated by a practical epistemic which rehearses significant questions about reality. Three are the pretexts on which run our comments, our discursive intervention. Primo: the French Revolution and the historical social sciences by acception wallesnsterniana. Second: reading that Gianni Vattimo makes in La fine de la modernitá of a paradigmatic Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, book and his concept of artistic revolution. Tertio: The controversial status of the social sciences, its epistemic status, its prevalence nomothetic.